11 November 2011
Diablo III on steroids... That's just amazing.
Too bad it's not Diablo. It's something that looks better though. I mean a lot better. But... really a LOT. This is why I was a bit worried about the Diablo 3 graphics and overall "lack of details", even in the latest beta. Enjoy this video, don't forget to switch HD on and feel free to skip to 01:00.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Meh, Diablo 3 is better :P
ReplyDeleteI still maintain that graphics are not enough. But let's wait and see how it goes. I'm not very concerned about the graphics, honestly. Diablo 2's graphics were terrible but we still played it for years.
What do you think of Skyrim? Are you going to play it?
Well it's hard to say if I like Skyrim or not. On paper... I should love it. But after watching numerous PC screenshots and videos I have to admit it does not look the way I wanted to. This is a kind of game where -in my opinion- gameplay AND graphics must be on par. And graphics/animations don't look that good, so far.
ReplyDeleteI will not drop m money without trying it, anyway. So either I find a friend or a demo or something, or it will stay on the (digital) shelve.
@ Darth
ReplyDeleteThis is a good example of Skyrim video (PC version) with everything on ultra. Npc's and animations don't look so good, to be honest.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GtjWMN3RlnA
If you jump to 06:47 you will see a "sneaky" attack with bow and arrows. It looks just ridiculous. The players one-hit the enemy on the head and he just keeps moonwalking with the arrow stuck on his cranium.
I don't know. For a title that is getting the highest scores in gaming history ... I was expecting better stuff.
@ Darth
ReplyDeleteWatch this video too, it really makes the "radiant AI" shine. Amazing stuff there.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=rt5aUdijAN8